Tuesday, September 17, 2013

DRACULA: PRINCE OF DARKNESS HITS BLU-RAY TODAY!

Available for the first time in the United States of America, the British are invading with Hammer's release of DRACULA: PRINCE OF DARKNESS, finally on Blu-Ray!  Thanks to the people from Millennium Entertainment, you can get your hands on this incredible collector's piece starting TODAY.  The film stars Christopher Lee in his iconic portrayal of everyone's favorite vampire.  The story is the sequel to Hammer's powerhouse film DRACULA (not to be confused with the Universal horror film of the same name) but this time Christopher Lee returns to suck the innocent blood of a group of stranded English tourists in the Carpathian Mountains. The film is absolutely stunning on Blu-Ray and seeing the special effects in HD further prove that there's nothing better than practical blood sucking.  The disc also includes some mind-melting special effects.  The audio commentary was rather entertaining, but I was blown away by the breathtaking stills gallery. 

Special Features Include:
  • Audio commentary with Christopher Lee, Barbara Shelley, Suzan Farmer and Francis Matthews
  • Exclusive still gallery (NEVER BEFORE RELEASED!)
  • Restored original trailer
  • Dracula: Prince of Darkness restoration comparison
  • Super 8MM behind-the-scenes footage
  • Brand new documentary- “Back to Black”
  • World of Hammer Episode: “Hammer Stars: Christopher Lee”
  • Printed Memorabilia perfect for every classic Hammer fan out there
Luckily, Millennium plans on releasing even MORE Classic Hammer titles in the future including Quartermass and the Pit, The Plague of the Zombies, and The Devil Rides Out.  

You can snag your copy of Dracula: Prince of Darkness anywhere Blu-Ray discs are sold, or on the good ol' Amazon.

Tuesday, September 10, 2013

THE GREATEST SHOTS OF WOMEN WITH WEAPONS

I had a few hours to kill yesterday, so I hit up my local movie theater for a $5 showing of YOU'RE NEXT.  At 3:00pm on a Monday, I was the only person in the theater and one of only four people (including the concession stand boy and the ticket girl) in the entire building.  If you follow me on twitter, you'll know that I spent the screening either dancing or singing as loud as possible to "Lookin' For The Magic" every time it came on.  I like watching movies a second time, and as much as I enjoy the theatrical experience, there's something exciting about being the only person in a theater.  For one thing, it allowed me to notice a lot of things that normally go unnoticed.  Knowing what was going to happen throughout the film, it gave me the opportunity to really examine what was on the screen.  I wrote about the female characters of the film already, but I failed to mention how incredibly bad-ass Sharni Vinson looks with a weapon in her hands.  It got me thinking, and there really isn't anything better than a woman with a weapon.  It doesn't matter if she's holding a weapon in defense or if she's the one about to do the killing, women and weapons always make for beautiful film scenes.  The more I thought about it, a large amount of my favorite horror movie stills (and promotional material) showcase women with weapons.  This is in no way a definitive list, it's just a compilation of my favorite images of women with weapons.
Sharni Vinson in YOU'RE NEXT

Sarah Butler and (unknown actress, rumored to be Demi Moore) in I SPIT ON YOUR GRAVE
Kathy Bates in MISERY
Cecile De France in HAUTE TENSION
Milla Jovovich in RESIDENT EVIL
Jocelin Donahue in HOUSE OF THE DEVIL
Linnea Quigley in HOLLYWOOD CHAINSAW HOOKERS
Danielle Harris in HALLOWEEN 4
Emma Stone in ZOMBIELAND
Stefania Casini in SUSPIRIA

Jennifer Rubin in A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET 3: DREAM WARRIORS
Kelli Maroney in NIGHT OF THE COMET
Kyra Schon in NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD
Shelley Duvall in THE SHINING

Friday, September 6, 2013

ANOTHER ASSHOLE WITH A HANDYCAM: HOW THE MODERN AGE IS DILUTING HORROR

Not gonna lie, this would scare the shit out of me.
I've been publicly writing about horror movies for the past five years, and I've been obsessed with the genre for an entire lifetime. I should be excited for how many horror films are being made in this age where anyone could make a movie, but I'm just not. Horror is more than just babes, blood, and screaming. Horror is a precise art form that if not executed properly, can become trite and uninteresting VERY, VERY fast. God, I hate that I'm being such a judgmental asshole about other people's artwork, but an important part of the cinematic arts is the way your audience responds to it.  With the technological advancements making it easier and easier for the Average Joe to make a movie, it's making it much more difficult for completed projects to actually reach an audience.  Film festival competitions are getting stiffer and harder to get accepted into, simply on the grounds that the volume of entries has grown.  Don't get me wrong, I love that so many people are making movies, but the fact so many people are making horror movies because they think it's the "easiest" genre to execute, makes me want to stab them in the arm with a fork and twist out their veins like spaghetti.

THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT! No wait! THE EVIL DEAD! No wait! DELIVERANCE! No wait! HATCHET! No wait! CABIN FEVER! NO WAIT...
What boggles my mind is that a lot of independent horror filmmakers are crying about there being so many horror movie remakes, but in the same breath decide that they want to make a horror movie about teenagers in the woods.  I'm sorry, but where is YOUR contribution to this originality you so crave? Everything is a copy of a copy of an inspiration of a copy of something at this point in time, which is why watching a movie like YOU'RE NEXT or THE CABIN IN THE WOODS is so refreshing to watch.  There are more locations for horror movies than an abandoned building or the woods.  Look, I understand why independent filmmakers do it. Abandoned buildings and forests are free locations, and when you're working with a limited budget you need to exploit free resources as best as you can.  However, never sacrifice originality in the name of saving a few bucks. Where can you change? Is there electricity? If it absolutely must be the woods, what does that say about your setting? Abandoned whatever doesn't always equal good.

Dressing your set = important. ANTIVIRAL proving less is more


It just feels like a lot of these independent filmmakers think that because they have a camera, or because they know someone who knows someone who has a RED, that they're set on making a great looking horror movie.  As we all know, that's just not the case.  My biggest pet peeve about the independent films I've been sent is a lack of set dressing.  So you're doing a scene in a living room that is owned by your sound guy, AWESOME! Well, does your sound guy have the same taste in art as your character? Is the furniture arranged in a way where you can shoot your scene and not have the boom mic end up shown in a mirror in the background? The way we behave in a classroom is differently than the way we behave in a doctor's office or a roller rink.  Your set is the world of the movie and you always want to make sure that your characters are living in the same world (or not at all, if that's what you're going for).  Just throwing people in a set and praying it works isn't going to cut it. You've gotta shape and mold your world, or else you're not doing your story justice.  That, and you're making a lame looking movie.

I want this shot framed on my wall. HOUSE OF THE DEVIL is friggen' GORGEOUS.
There's also a HUGE lack of cinematography.  Cinematography is a matter of knowing how to frame a shot. Think about the action that you want to display and then how you want to set it up. This helps dramatically with how you want to light it too. Think of the motivation and how you wanted to play out in the scene.  I'm not saying you have to go to film school to become a filmmaker, because that's just not true. Film making is an artform, it's a hands on creation that only gets better with practice.  However, taking every single "cool" shot you've ever seen in a movie and throwing it all together isn't going to make a "cool" film. It's going to make a jumbled mess that's hard on the eyes and looks like every bad first film school project.  Unfortunately, that's what most of these independent eyesores are doing.  Learn from the movies you love and then emulate them rather than replicate them. If your film isn't visually interesting, you're not bringing anything interesting to the table.  Your film will then be just another horror film made my some douche that people only watch on Netflix when they're drunk to make fun of it.  If that's what you're going for, then fine.  If that's not what you want, then put some effort into it and do your homework.  The lack of pre and post production is also baffling. How the fuck are you filming a movie on a Saturday and releasing it on YouTube on a Wednesday?  Are you kidding me?  Do some color correction, do some editing, add some music, do SOMETHING!  Post production can make or break your film, people. Don't just haphazardly edit some shit together and hope for the best.  CONSTRUCT IT, YO!

Who needs an ending when you can just post a link to a website, AMIRITE?! *puts gun in mouth*


Perhaps most importantly, is a solid script. Without a shadow of a doubt, the biggest problem independent horror films suffer from is a poor script. What is with these insanely asinine stories that are being produced every time I turn around? A script needs to tell a story, convey a message, do SOMETHING.  If you just think "How crazy would it be to rape a 12 year old with a knife?" and try to write a story around it, you're failing.  Nothing infuriates me more than writing shock for the sake of shock.  I think it's cheap and uninspiring.  The SAW films may have tons of gore and killing, but even SAW VI gave an insight to the fractured American medical insurance industry.  Look for different voices to be heard in the script. Characters are brought to life on the page first. If you have concerns about what is written it'll show up in the final product.  Please, re-read what you write. Can you ever hear people talking the way your characters are written to speak? No? Then re-write it.  Are your characters the kind of people you'd be invested in watching? No? Then re-write them. If you yourself wouldn't want to watch a situation with the characters you've created, then you can't expect anyone else to want to watch them either.

Your Oscar can't protect you from TCM: Next Generation on your resume, Renee Zellweger...

Finally, a message for the actors.  What are you gaining by performing in these shit-house horror movies?  Horror is the jumping off point for the careers of many actors, this is true, but you're allowed to be picky with the roles you accept.  So you're going to play a bloodied up set of tits in booty shorts without any rhyme or reason to be in this outfit and you aren't being paid and there's no closed set or safety release forms involved?  Yeah, sounds perfectly legit.  There's a lot of sketchy people out there and as much as I know people want to have a wide range of roles on their resumes or reels, at what cost are you willing to sacrifice your time and talent?  I get needing the money, but a lot of these independent gigs pay very little. In that case, is it worth it? If you're sent a script you find zero merit in, don't get involved.  If you audition for a part that requires you to do or wear things you're not comfortable with, don't do it. These vile pieces of horror garbage aren't going to skyrocket you into fame, and showing your tits on camera doesn't mean you're a "dedicated" actress.  Trust me when I say, people don't forget the gross films you did before you were famous.  Especially in the age of the internet, I would never do something I wouldn't be proud to talk about performing in on a panel at a festival.  Why do you wanna do this project? This is a legacy, a body of work. Is this something you'll be proud of in a year? 5 years? 30 years? If not...don't do it.

Horror, just sucks you right in. WAKKA WAKKA.

Horror gets a bad enough rap for being violent, vulgar, vile, and exploitative.  With all of these stigmas already attached to it, why would you want to make a movie that was anything other than well executed? If you don't do these things you're taking advantage of the one film genre that seems to welcome every filmmaker regardless of skill or talent. This perpetuates the stereotype and the stigma associated with the fans and their audience, that what we like is a low form of entertainment and easy to make.  You're taking advantage of every actor or director or designer that ever got their start in low-budget horror with your thinking that you can do better but failing to do so.  Unfortunately, filmmaking isn't for everyone.  It doesn't matter how much you love watching movies, making movies is an entirely different beast. Just because you have a camera, doesn't mean you can make a good movie.  If you enjoy the creative process, perfect your craft.  If you just want the attention or the fame, stick to recording your niece's dance recital and stop diluting the watering hole for those that actually care.
Related Posts with Thumbnails